The Absurdity of Scientific Creationism Essay - 2866 Words

The Absurdity of Scientific Creationism We humans have always thought of ourselves as being unique, whether by divine sanction or by a self-established belief in superiority. For some, this understanding is intimately tied to the traditional tenets that have long been held as fact, having only recently been challenged. For modern Christians, the literal interpretation of the Bible=s account of creation has come under attack by the development and widespread acceptance of Darwinian evolution. To some, undermining the credibility of Biblical creation directly calls into question the Bible=s authority on its moral teachings. As Ken Ham, from the WGBH Boston Video Evolution Series: What About God? states, AYwhat it [the Bible] says†¦show more content†¦On the contrary, Henry Morris is shrewd with his presentation and explanations, and it is easy to see how a non-science versed individual could be persuaded into doubting the merits of evolution. Case 1: AThe Wistful Search for Good Mutations@ In Morris= The Modern Creation Trilogy: Science Creation[ii], he challenges the scientifically and commonly held notion of genetic mutations as the raw material of evolution (p. 176)[iii]. Although many scientists have acknowledged that the chance occurrence of a beneficial mutation is significantly low in comparison to any random mutation in general, Morris runs off with this idea and exploits it as another example where evolution has got it wrong. For Morris, it almost appears as if the evolutionary theory is part of the a greater Aconspiracy@ to deny the existence of God. AThe concept seems merely to be a commentary on the intense desire of evolutionists to avoid the Creator@ (p. 39)[iv]. Continuing on with Morris= logic on the unfeasibility of genetic mutations as a valid mechanism of evolution, he states that Aa beneficial= mutation, even if natural selection is there waiting to conserve one if it comes along, is simply a figment of the evolutionary imagination. None has yet been documented in real life= B that is, a mutation beneficial to the creature experiencing it@ (p. 39)[v]. To refute this claim, let us consider a well-known and characterized genetic disease,Show MoreRelatedAtheism Is Not A Religion, A Worldview Or A Belief System1618 Words   |  7 Pagesevidence. Christians follow the teachings of â€Å"Jesus Christ† written in the bible. They believe god created the earth in seven days and that he will soon send his son, Jesus to earth to take the faithful to heaven. Deep analyzation of evolution, creationism, and the bible will surely reveal the truth. Evolution, is basically â€Å"decent with modification†, this applies to microevolution and macroevolution. (www.evolution.berkeley.edu) Evolution, when on a smaller scale is defined as microevolution; anRead MoreThe Multiverse Theory1003 Words   |  5 Pagesfrom the secular background reason that this theory either erases the need for a creator or moves another step toward doing so (Weinberg), while scientists from religious backgrounds or who hold religious beliefs feel that it results in logical absurdities or merely moves the matter of creation to a different location and time (Strobel). While both cannot be right, both certainly desire to ascertain more information. A Noble Prize winner, Steven Weinberg once said in a lecture, â€Å"I am not impressedRead MoreOrthodoxy and Progressivism: America’s Battle over Education and a Silent Majority3201 Words   |  13 Pagesopinions on both ends of the divide. Basically, the scientific community in today’s academia holds many positions that are counter to the ID movement. The idea that ID is close-minded since it forces observations to conform to one’s beliefs rather that forcing one’s beliefs to conform to the evidence of observations. Another view is that ID is dishonest because it points to a false controversy, stating that ID is not accepted by the scientific community or allowed to be published – when in factRead MoreEssay about Intelligent Design of the Universe2128 Words   |  9 Pagesearth had a common ancestor and that through a process of evolution, all living organisms descended from this common ancestor(Coyne). Chevalier de Lamarck, a French naturalist proposed a theory of evolution in 1809. His idea did not get much scientific consideration until Charles R. Darwin announced his theory of evolution(Coyne). Darwin published his most famous book, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection(Valentine) in 1859. Darwin stated that offspring resemble their parentsRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 PagesExplanations ........................................................................................ 483 Assessing Alternative Explanations ................................................................................................ 488 The Scientific Method ........................................................................................................................ 490 Some Case Studies .............................................................................................